Download

Download Full Text (88 KB)

Description

This commentary is about how inconsistent terminology surrounding unmanned and intelligent systems can create confusion in military planning and policy discussions. Terms such as automatic, remote, and autonomous are often used interchangeably in defense discourse, despite describing distinct technological capabilities and levels of human control. This ambiguity can hinder effective evaluation, governance, and operational use of unmanned systems in modern warfare. As machines increasingly support sensing, decision-making, and action on the battlefield, precise terminology becomes essential for doctrine development, training, command authority, and ethical oversight. Clearer definitions and conceptual frameworks can ensure that emerging technologies are understood and integrated into military operations with accuracy and strategic coherence.

Document Type

Article

Topic(s)

Emerging Science and Technologies, Military Strategy, Defense Policy

Region(s)

United States

Publication Date

3-11-2026

Keywords

unmanned systems, autonomous systems, remote systems, automatic systems, military terminology, autonomous weapons systems, human-machine teaming, military doctrine, emerging military technologies, command and control, operational terminology, defense policy

Precision in Words, Precision in Warfare: Terminology and Control in Military Discourse on Unmanned Systems

Share

COinS