Download

Download Full Text (353 KB)

Description

This policy brief examines the growing threat posed by apocalyptic, religiously motivated terrorist movements, particularly al Qaeda, and argues that their ideology, intent, and capabilities require a reassessment of international norms governing the use of force. Unlike earlier terrorist groups constrained by political objectives, apocalyptic terrorists seek mass casualties and reject traditional limits on violence, making purely reactive or law-enforcement approaches inadequate. The brief contends that under certain circumstances states must retain the ability to take preventive action, including military operations on foreign territory, when governments are unwilling or unable to suppress terrorist threats within their borders. Drawing on principles of customary international law, sovereign responsibility, and the inherent right of self-defense under the UN Charter, the author makes the case that preventive action can be legally and morally justified. Building international consensus around this doctrine is essential to sustaining legitimacy in the global struggle against terrorism.

Document Type

Policy Brief

Topic(s)

International Law, National Security, Terrorism and Extremism

Publication Date

11-2004

Publication

Strategic Forum

Publisher

National Defense University Press

City

Washington, DC

Keywords

Apocalyptic Terrorism, Preventive Self-Defense, Terrorism and International Law, Hostis Humani Generis, Sovereign Responsibility, Use of Force Doctrine, United Nations Charter Article 51, Counterterrorism Strategy, Preemptive Military Action, State Responsibility, Global War on Terrorism, Customary International Law, Armed Intervention, Terrorist Safe Havens, Collective Self-Defense

Apocalyptic Terrorism: The Case for Preventive Action

Share

COinS