Beyond the Peninsula: What OPCON Transfer Means for the Indo-Pacific
Abstract
This article in The Diplomat is the last in a series and examines the strategic implications of transferring wartime operational control (OPCON) from the United States to the Republic of Korea and what the shift means beyond the Korean Peninsula. Rather than treating OPCON as a narrowly bilateral command issue, the analysis situates the transition within broader U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy and alliance management. It argues that successful OPCON transfer could reshape force posture, burden-sharing, and command relationships across the region, with implications for deterrence and contingency planning. The article highlights how alliance readiness, political signaling, and regional perceptions will influence whether OPCON transition strengthens or complicates U.S. strategic objectives. Ultimately, the piece frames OPCON as a test case for adapting U.S. alliances to evolving security demands in the Indo-Pacific.
Document Type
Article
Topic(s)
Defense Policy, Military Strategy, National Security
Region(s)
Indo-Pacific, East Asia, Korean Peninsula
Publication Date
2-11-2026
Recommended Citation
Work, Clint, "Beyond the Peninsula: What OPCON Transfer Means for the Indo-Pacific" (2026). Articles & Op-Eds. 26.
https://digitalcommons.ndu.edu/csr-articles/26