Files
Download Full Text (317 KB)
Description
This Strategic Forum analyzes the institutional challenges facing strategic decisionmaking within the U.S. Department of Defense and proposes reforms to improve how senior leaders make and support decisions. It highlights how existing processes — designed to be rational and methodical — are often undermined by bureaucratic stovepipes, consensus-oriented products, and limited integration of analytic support. The paper argues for the creation of a dedicated Decision Support Cell reporting directly to the Secretary of Defense to provide integrated rational analyses and to enhance intuitive decisionmaking through exercises and shared experience. By clarifying baseline assumptions, improving cross-bureaucratic collaboration, and balancing rational and intuitive elements, the proposed reforms aim to elevate the quality and coherence of strategic choices in peace and war. Effective decision support is framed as essential to aligning strategic agenda, planning, and resource allocation across the Pentagon.
Document Type
Policy Brief
Region(s)
United States
Topic(s)
Defense Policy, Leadership, Future Strategic Concepts
Publication Date
7-2006
Publication
Strategic Forum
Publisher
National Defense University Press
City
Washington, DC
Keywords
Pentagon strategic decisionmaking reform, Department of Defense decision support, Strategic decision support cell, DoD strategic governance, rational vs. intuitive decision processes, senior leader decisionmaking challenges, Quadrennial Defense Review implication, Bureaucratic reform DoD
Recommended Citation
Lamb, Christopher J. and Lachow, Irving, "Reforming Pentagon Strategic Decisionmaking" (2006). Strategic Forums. 21.
https://digitalcommons.ndu.edu/strategic-forums/21